Prelates are members of the College of Prelates, and are generally accorded the title of "Bishop" after their elevation or consecration. As with most titles in TTO, the exact choice is somewhat at the discretion of the individual.
Clergy are official representatives of EGH. They have initial and continuing educational requirements
Confirmed members of the EGH may enter into Novitiate Training by submitting a Declaration of Intent to the Secretary of the College of Prelates. In respect to the individual nature of Thelema, there are no formal requirements to submit a Petition for Ordination, however it is expected that the Novice must undertake Mastery in three Qualities:
Novice Clergy may, like all Clergy, develop and perform their own liturgy or variants on liturgy, provided that they have completed all relevant and current safety and consent training.
Other Sacraments require written authority of Fully Ordained Clergy.
Novice Clergy, while accorded respect, are not considered to be official representatives of the EGH.
The Lay Clergy is made up of all of those individuals who are at least Corresponding members and who hold various roles of leadership and responsibility within the EGH, but who do not currently intend to progress to ordination. The organization and acceptance of various positions within the Lay Priesthood is under the authority of the Ordained Clergy of a Chartered Group. For example, a given Group might establish a system of Deacons, Assistant Priests, Sacristans, or any other arrangement which suits their operation.
TTO tolerates no discrimination based on gender, gender expression, sexuality or sexual expression.
The choice of title, roles, etc. within the various rituals of EGH is at the discretion of the individual clergy member on a fluid ritual-by-ritual basis.
It is expressly against the discrimination policy of TTO for any officiant, Ordained Clergy, Local Master etc., in any setting private or public to disqualify an individual from a preferred role solely on the basis of gender, gender expression, sexuality or sexual expression.
Preference may not be used to mask discrimination. Thus a phrasing such as "we would prefer a cis-gender male for this role" is coercive and constitutes discrimination as it would clearly tend to dissuade persons of any other gender from applying for the role.
Any individual member of the Clergy may choose at any time to withdraw from any ritual or ceremony for any reason. That may include being placed in a situation where they would be forced into any interaction which would be uncomfortable for them for whatever reason. The choice to withdraw is personal, a vital element of consent, and should not be questioned.
Withdrawal may not be used as a public, de facto, weapon of exclusion. The private choice to withdraw because of discomfort with a co-celebrant's gender expression is a matter of personal consent. Expression of it in such a way as to cause strife, disharmony, humiliation, or dissuade further participation on the part of the co-celebrant is discriminatory.
While individual gender expression may be fluid, provided there is no special discrimination in regards to individuals of a given gender, "locking in" certain roles in a given ritual a sufficient time in advance to allow for rehearsal, advertisement, and planning, is not discriminatory.
A consistent preference for working in ritual with a given partner or circle of partners is not evidence of discrimination. At public bodies it is expected that due consideration will be given to ensuring all Clergy are able, on some reasonable cycle, to participate in ritual. At private bodies, the prevalence of a given group of Clergy may constitute a norm.
There is an EGH event at my Group. Who has the ultimate say-so on what can happen? The Ordained Clergy presenting the EGH Ceremony, or the Local Group Leader?